When you purchase one thing, often it’s best to get what you buy inside a sure diploma of expectations. When you don’t, then that will be like dishonest, wouldn’t you say? The different day we heard a disturbing report of how Western Digital was apparently bait and switching its SSDs, the place overview items supplied up the marketed efficiency, however the precise items didn’t.
It was reported then that different SSD makers like Adata, Crucial, and Patriot had been additionally discovered to have completed the identical factor, and now it seems like we’d have the ability to add Samsung to that record. This is in accordance with a report from Computerbase.de who noticed a video on YouTube in Chinese the place it compares two seemingly similar Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSDs.
On the floor, each drives look like related, together with all its figuring out textual content and labels. However, the older drive has the mannequin quantity MZVLB1T0HBLR, whereas the newer one has the mannequin quantity MZVL21T0HBLU. They then peeled again the stickers and found that beneath, it was a unique story.
The older mannequin makes use of the Phoenix drive whereas the newer one makes use of an Elpis drive. Performance sensible, the benchmarks present that on some fronts, each drives are similar, however on different exams, the one with the Elpis one performs far worse.
Previous stories had attributed the chip scarcity as one of many the reason why SSD makers have needed to search out options to sure parts, however the lack of transparency is what’s bothering many individuals, particularly if these drives don’t reside as much as their marketed claims.
Filed in. Read extra about Samsung. Source: extremetech